Power Rankings 2007 Week 10
The power rankings for this site were developed in this article. The idea behind them is simple: if each team played one home game and one away game against every other team in the league, who would be the most successful?
The power rankings use logistic regression to predict the probability of winning. The score you see along with the rankings is the expected win total over a 16-game season based on the expected winning percentages over the 62 games (i.e. the sum of those probabilities).
New England is mediocre in run offense and defense according to yards per play. That is the sole reason they are #2 to Dallas. Indy and San Diego stay more or less in place despite sloppy games. Minnesota is still really high because Adrian Peterson has been so ridiculously good and so has their run defense. By yards per play, they are 43% above league average running the ball and 27% above league average stopping the run. They are 16% and 7% below average in pass offense and defense respectively. Philadelphia is at #9 and looks poised to make a comeback in the division, though the ranking seems to be based a lot on the strength of their running game. Similarly, Miami is considered a middle of the pack team with 4.6 yards per carry on offense and an improving but still sucky defense.
Power Rankings, Opponent-adjusted | ||
Rank | Team | Expected Wins |
1 | DAL | 11.6155 |
2 | NE | 11.4932 |
3 | IND | 11.0721 |
4 | PIT | 10.4505 |
5 | TB | 10.0557 |
6 | MIN | 9.2326 |
7 | GB | 9.1011 |
8 | NYG | 9.0704 |
9 | PHI | 8.8011 |
10 | TEN | 8.7476 |
11 | SEA | 8.4169 |
12 | WAS | 8.3712 |
13 | JAX | 8.2691 |
14 | SD | 7.9571 |
15 | ARI | 7.9354 |
16 | CLE | 7.7619 |
17 | DEN | 7.7385 |
18 | MIA | 7.6025 |
19 | DET | 7.5167 |
20 | CAR | 7.4233 |
21 | ATL | 7.3070 |
22 | HOU | 7.2890 |
23 | BUF | 7.1928 |
24 | CIN | 7.0074 |
25 | BAL | 6.7075 |
26 | NO | 6.6808 |
27 | KC | 6.4052 |
28 | CHI | 6.3966 |
29 | STL | 6.2136 |
30 | SF | 5.5396 |
31 | NYJ | 5.3895 |
32 | OAK | 5.2385 |
No comments:
Post a Comment