Creating Power Rankings
Just as a lark, I figured I'd try devising some power rankings using my model. The basic idea behind them is this: If every team played each other once at home, once at away, who would win the most?
I tested this idea on the 2006 teams after the end of the regular season. Using my adj. rush, adj. pass, sack, adj. 3rd down conv., and turnover data, I trained a linear regression predictor on all games before 2006. Then I used the model to predict the outcomes of all 992 possible games. I created 2 separate rankings: one based on the sum of margins of victory/defeat, one based on the expected winning percentage.
Rank | Team | Sum of Exp. Margins |
1 | PHI | 4.2027 |
2 | SD | 4.1368 |
3 | BAL | 3.8437 |
4 | JAX | 3.2917 |
5 | DAL | 2.1643 |
6 | CHI | 2.1514 |
7 | PIT | 1.9942 |
8 | NO | 1.8954 |
9 | IND | 1.7482 |
10 | NE | 1.5237 |
11 | MIN | 1.1935 |
12 | CAR | 1.1847 |
13 | ATL | 0.94039 |
14 | NYG | 0.84285 |
15 | MIA | 0.82191 |
16 | GB | 0.71736 |
17 | CIN | 0.52797 |
18 | DEN | 0.33802 |
19 | KC | 0.29031 |
20 | SF | -0.685 |
21 | WAS | -1.0359 |
22 | STL | -1.4769 |
23 | NYJ | -1.5889 |
24 | SEA | -2.0378 |
25 | BUF | -2.3402 |
26 | TEN | -2.4492 |
27 | TB | -2.8237 |
28 | ARI | -3.2092 |
29 | DET | -3.6094 |
30 | OAK | -3.7756 |
31 | HOU | -3.8764 |
32 | CLE | -4.9007 |
Rank | Exp. Win % | Team |
1t | BAL | 0.83871 |
1t | PHI | 0.83871 |
3 | SD | 0.80645 |
4 | JAX | 0.72581 |
5t | CHI | 0.66129 |
5t | NO | 0.66129 |
7 | NE | 0.64516 |
8t | DAL | 0.62903 |
8t | CAR | 0.62903 |
10t | PIT | 0.6129 |
10t | IND | 0.6129 |
10t | MIN | 0.6129 |
13t | MIA | 0.59677 |
13t | ATL | 0.59677 |
15 | NYG | 0.58065 |
16 | GB | 0.56452 |
17t | CIN | 0.54839 |
17t | DEN | 0.54839 |
17t | KC | 0.54839 |
20t | STL | 0.43548 |
20t | SF | 0.43548 |
22t | NYJ | 0.41935 |
22t | WAS | 0.41935 |
24 | SEA | 0.33871 |
25 | TEN | 0.32258 |
26 | BUF | 0.27419 |
27t | OAK | 0.19355 |
27t | ARI | 0.19355 |
29t | CLE | 0.17742 |
29t | HOU | 0.17742 |
29t | DET | 0.17742 |
29t | TB | 0.17742 |
Looking at the bottom, it's about what you'd expect. Seattle, a playoff team, shows up at #24 in both rankings, but they were 8-8 in a weak division and suffered some losses due to injury and free agency. The Jets, another playoff team, show up at #23 and #22 respectively due to weak rushing offense and defense and average passing offense and defense. Seattle and the Jets were #25 and #19 respectively in Football Outsider's 2006 DVOA rankings. Philadelphia, despite a 10-6 record, shows up at #1 with a very strong offense (14.721% VOLA rushing, 20.58% passing unadj.). Jacksonville also obtains a very high ranking (#4) despite its record, a mediocre 8-8, thanks to well above average rush offense and defense. New England is a little low compared to DVOA (#10 and #7, #5) with average and below average YPA numbers but high sack and interception rates. The Super Bowl champion Colts are at #9 and #10 (DVOA #7) with 20.142% VOLA in pass offense and 26.09% VOLA in pass defense(!too high!) but -28.29% VOLA rush defense.
So overall, the rankings turn out very similar to the DVOA rankings with individual teams gaining or losing a couple spots. There are no major disparities, however, that I can see, except maybe Dallas showing up too high in the ranking by points. It would be interesting to calculate these rankings over the season and compare these with other rankings.
Figures and article corrected on 7/12/2007 after finding errors in some box scores.
No comments:
Post a Comment